An annual procurement plan becomes useful when it tells the team when to start each sourcing event, who owns the next action, and whether a need-by date is at risk. A spreadsheet exchanged by email can hold the original demand, but it is a weak system of record for continuing updates.

"Streamlining Workflow: A Process Automation Coach transforms a pile of tasks into an efficient, automated system for seamless order management." A manager emails a purchase request to a director. The director replies “OK”. Procurement acts on it. Simple enough—until someone asks which version of the request was approved, when the decision was made, or where to find the record. Then the team searches Outlook, forwards a few messages, and tries to reconstruct the process from

Shelfware taught procurement to ask whether software was being used. Consumption pricing requires another question: Is the additional usage still worth what we are paying for it?

Here we are expecting a breakthrough performance without: redesigning processes (e.g., digitisation vs digitalisation) relieving people's fears of job loss, developing new skill sets, assigning ownership, enforcing usage, measuring outcomes.

Whether the large SaaS vendors can keep control of the orchesration and integration layer remains one of the most interesting questions in the enterprise software industry.

Most organisational inefficiency comes from undefined states, unclear ownership, and uncontrolled transitions — not from a lack of intelligence. Those problems are solved with basic RPA and workflow design, not machine learning.

Nano-SaaS, therefore, emerges precisely where incumbents stop: at the level of micro-niche problems that only become viable when developed through vibe coding.

Automate document approval workflows with Microsoft 365, Power Automate and SharePoint. Eliminate email approvals, improve governance, and accelerate business processes.

And that’s the paradox: you’re buying intelligence, but unless you govern it smartly, it makes your cost model dumber.